Comparison

TracePath vs Grafana LGTM.

One observability backend instead of four services to operate, with the same OpenTelemetry plumbing underneath.

We build TracePath, so read this with that in mind. Every claim about Grafana LGTM below comes from their own public documentation, checked on 2026-09-21, and we quote no competitor prices because they change without notice.

Capabilities

Side by side.

CapabilityTracePathGrafana LGTM
Logs, traces and metrics in one UIYesYes
Stateful systems to operate0 (managed)4+ (self-run)
Error tracking & session replayYesSeparate products
Dashboards as codeYesYes
OpenTelemetry ingestYesYes
Query languages to learn13
Uptime monitors & on-callYesAdditional components
Who runs itWe doYou do (or Grafana Cloud)

Capabilities verified 2026-09-21 against each vendor's public documentation. Products change — spotted something stale? Tell us.

FAQ

Common questions.

Does TracePath replace Grafana dashboards?

For data that lives in TracePath, yes — and you can import your existing Grafana dashboard JSON instead of rebuilding panels by hand.

Can I keep Grafana and send it TracePath data?

Not today. TracePath does not expose a Grafana datasource, so the practical pattern while you evaluate is to fan out from your collector to both backends and compare them side by side.

Is self-hosting LGTM cheaper?

The software is free; the storage, the nodes and the engineer who keeps four stateful systems healthy are not. Compare against your own total cost rather than a licence fee.

Set up in minutes

Works with your stack.

Other comparisons

See your app the way users do.

Errors, traces, logs, replay and monitors in one OpenTelemetry-native backend, at a price you can predict.